glbedd53 was the one quoting Clinton. Nitrogen was validating Clinton's statement, which was dishonest because Clinton wasn't talking about hunting. He was talking about banning AKs because you can't use them for duck hunting - which is like saying that screwdrivers should be banned because you can't really use them effectively to drive a nail with.Purplehood wrote:I suspect that he was simply quoting Bill Clinton.The Annoyed Man wrote:But that wasn't his point, and you know it. He was using that as a justification for banning AK47s. Are you in agreement with his viewpoint in that regard?nitrogen wrote:He's right. Then again, if you can hit a duck with an AK-47, you're a better hunter than I am.glbedd53 wrote:Bill Clinton said "you don't need an AK-47 to hunt ducks".
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Scalia takes Kagan to gun range, sources say”
- Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:18 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Scalia takes Kagan to gun range, sources say
- Replies: 31
- Views: 4298
Re: Scalia takes Kagan to gun range, sources say
- Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:50 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Scalia takes Kagan to gun range, sources say
- Replies: 31
- Views: 4298
Re: Scalia takes Kagan to gun range, sources say
But that wasn't his point, and you know it. He was using that as a justification for banning AK47s. Are you in agreement with his viewpoint in that regard?nitrogen wrote:He's right. Then again, if you can hit a duck with an AK-47, you're a better hunter than I am.glbedd53 wrote:Bill Clinton said "you don't need an AK-47 to hunt ducks".
