Ah. Thank you.Charles L. Cotton wrote:One session to make the substantive change (repeal TPC §46.035(a)) and a second session for a non-substantive clean-up bill.The Annoyed Man wrote:Charles, I'll do my best to honor your request.Question: why two sessions, and not one or five?Charles L. Cotton wrote:I can't answer because I haven't seen their bill, but to do it in the safest manner in Texas, it needs to be done over two sessions.TLE2 wrote:Just in asking, if such legislation is supported by the TSRA, would the Oklahoma law be a good model?
Chas.
Chas.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Open-Carry Discussions”
- Tue May 22, 2012 8:58 pm
- Forum: 2012 Texas & Federal Elections
- Topic: Open-Carry Discussions
- Replies: 17
- Views: 18253
Re: Open-Carry Discussions
- Mon May 21, 2012 1:56 pm
- Forum: 2012 Texas & Federal Elections
- Topic: Open-Carry Discussions
- Replies: 17
- Views: 18253
Re: Open-Carry Discussions
Charles, I'll do my best to honor your request.
Question: why two sessions, and not one or five?Charles L. Cotton wrote:I can't answer because I haven't seen their bill, but to do it in the safest manner in Texas, it needs to be done over two sessions.TLE2 wrote:Just in asking, if such legislation is supported by the TSRA, would the Oklahoma law be a good model?
Chas.