I'm sorry.....I do understand the reference to S&W, and I'm not trying to argue with you, but I am confused about what you are trying to say. Magpul is not doing anything that a dozen or more other manufacturers of firearms and/or firearms accessories haven't also been doing in reaction to draconian laws passed by various states. They are far from the only ones. You may not like their products (frankly, I don't care....I have a BUNCH of their products and have been buying them for years and I'm a very satisfied customer), but your poor opinion of their products has little or nothing to do with their political activism. I can't particularly stand Kel Tec products. It's a personal thing. But if the state of Florida were to pass the kinds of laws that Colorado, California, New York, and Connecticut have recently passed, I would absolutely applaud Kel Tec (which is located in Florida) if they declined to sell any more of their products to the state government which tried to trample on their market. My personal opinion of their products has little or no bearing on whether or not they are doing the right thing in terms of corporate political activism.DevilDawg wrote:Yes, Smith & Wesson and here is a link from the nra records. If they had to face the same firestorm then that the internet has put on Magpul now, there might have been a little less celebration by the Clinton team.C-dub wrote:I'm sorry. I can't put together who S&W is in your post. The only thing I can think of is Smith & Wesson. If that's it I don't understand how you're applying it.
http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/news- ... l-out.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To the resolute supporters of magpul:
If a person can't see the expert level marketing spin being pulled over their eyes by Magpul now, you are better parted with your money to prevent you from aiding and abeting any further as the battle continues for our Uninfringed Rights.
Just my 2¢....