Also, the font above the door handle is not the same as below the handle, AND the top text is not in correct perspective to the door either, which means that somebody originally photoshopped the image to say one thing, and then somebody later added the opaque panel and lower text below to "repurpose" the original "repurpose" of the image.
Does your head hurt yet?
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Buffalo WW disregards 2A?”
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:32 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Buffalo WW disregards 2A?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6070
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:28 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Buffalo WW disregards 2A?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6070
Re: Buffalo WW disregards 2A?
Easy.... it's BWW, not real wings.WildBill wrote:How can you guys be talking Photoshop when we're talking wings?The Annoyed Man wrote:It's not even on the same perspective plane.Jusme wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:TOTALLY photoshopped.G.A. Heath wrote:The bottom of the door (Below the silver bar) looks photo-shopped. I call this photo as fake.
Yep no reflection in the lower portion and the edge of the sign is extended past the frame.
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:27 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Buffalo WW disregards 2A?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6070
Re: Buffalo WW disregards 2A?
It's not even on the same perspective plane.Jusme wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:TOTALLY photoshopped.G.A. Heath wrote:The bottom of the door (Below the silver bar) looks photo-shopped. I call this photo as fake.
Yep no reflection in the lower portion and the edge of the sign is extended past the frame.
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:21 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Buffalo WW disregards 2A?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6070
Re: Buffalo WW disregards 2A?
TOTALLY photoshopped.G.A. Heath wrote:The bottom of the door (Below the silver bar) looks photo-shopped. I call this photo as fake.
