TexasCHLforum.com

philip964 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:03 am https://x.com/stillgray/status/1819749390002823658?s=46

Commala explains how she will fix inflation.

Rafe wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 11:05 am What is disturbing to me--but isn't shocking--is that the Biden/Harris campaign is now worried because a big chunk of their base is basically 50/50 about supporting Israel; the feeling is that if Uncle Joe doesn't lighten the rhetoric and financial/military support for Israel, that it could damage him even more in next year's election. I think this is one reason his handlers had him go, within just days, from "we unequivocally stand by Israel" to "well, maybe Israel should lighten up a little bit on the military action for a while, you know, stand back and assess things."

That important base of voters? Gen Z, people born between the late 1990s and early 2010s. In other words, the 18-24-year-olds who have been thoroughly inculcated into left-thinking by our educational system and the ultra-liberal influencers who spend time and money "training" this generation of voters.

A Harvard-Harris poll from October, after the attack on Israel, got 2,116 responses and found that 84% of Americans were in support of Israel, with 16% indicating direct support for Hamas. But that went very differently by age group. The 18-24 group showed 52% for Israel, and 48% for Hamas.

An NPR-PBS-Marist poll from October 11 showed that only 48% of respondents in the 18-to-29 age group said the U.S. government should support Israel.

A Quinnipiac poll, taken October 12-16 indicated that almost 20% of 18-to-34 age groups feels explicitly that Israel is responsible for the outbreak of violence in the Middle East, not Hamas.

Where are we as a country headed if, come 2040, this is the generation of political "leaders" entering office in their 40s?

philip964 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:02 pm https://wamu.org/story/20/08/12/kamala- ... ning-mate/

As a candidate for President she proposed many new gun restrictions.

How will she be as Biden’s running mate?

Probably you should vote for the orange man.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstuction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added.

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of The United States, ...

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

1. Do they actually BELIEVE and AGREE with these words?
2. Do they believe OR NOT believe that this nation is at or rapidly approaching a similar crossroads?
3. What are they willing to do about it, if their votes are overruled by an anti-Constitutional majority bent on completely changing the structure of our gov’t and ending our economic way of life?
4. How far are they willing to go?
5. Are they all hat and no cattle?