With all due respect to Hickok45, a compromise is where each group gives up a little something to get something in return.
If we agree to a ban on bump stocks, what are the gun grabbers giving up? What do we get in return?
A promise from Pelosi to use this as the start of the "Slippery slope"?
Oh, yeah - that's a bargain.
Oh, and for the record: I am a life member of TSRA and an Endowment Level member of the NRA.
I support TSRA dinners and volunteer at the annual NRA meetings.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks”
- Fri Oct 06, 2017 4:30 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
- Replies: 120
- Views: 34035
- Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:23 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
- Replies: 120
- Views: 34035
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
Anygunanywhere wrote:
But I fear that the antigunners will get their ban and we will get an empty promise from Cornyn to "Get 'em next time."
Will someone please primary this RINO?
I'd love to contribute to his opponent in a primary.
I agree on all points: Couple the SHARE act with a bump fire ban and I'm on board.
But I fear that the antigunners will get their ban and we will get an empty promise from Cornyn to "Get 'em next time."
Will someone please primary this RINO?
I'd love to contribute to his opponent in a primary.