Search found 2 matches

by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:26 pm
Forum: Holsters & Accessories
Topic: C-TAC review
Replies: 20
Views: 6063

nitrogen wrote:Ghurka is a bit more secure than a ctac, but it's not tuckable. It's also more comfortable, because I don't have the clips poking me in the side.

I also find the Ghurka is a lot more forgiving of a cheap belt than the CTAC is. :oops: My only problem with the CTAC is that since it's so wide, it pulls down more of my pants and belt, and the adjustable clips will poke at me after long periods of time. (I actually tried filing the clips down, but they cracked, so I needed new ones.)

The Ghurka is much narrower, and pulls on much less of my belt. Since I rarely require tucking, I find I actually like the Ghurka better. I can actually drive long distances with my M&P pressed against me in the bucket seat and it doesn't poke at my butt and my hip. I can even relax on the couch for long periods of time with it on, and i've fallen asleep while doing so.
Thanks for the review.
Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:48 pm
Forum: Holsters & Accessories
Topic: C-TAC review
Replies: 20
Views: 6063

nitrogen wrote:I love the Comptac product. I have Ghurka and CTAC holsters for both my carry guns, and love them, and would recommend them to anyone.
I have CTAC's for several of my guns and I've considered trying a Ghurka. How does it compare to the CTAC?

Thanks,
Chas.

Return to “C-TAC review”