Yeah, but everyone knows Jerry's not human. Not a fair comparison.Excaliber wrote:The same can be said of the revolver. The video evidence is here.G26ster wrote:In the right hands, an almost 70 year old carbine can make you think it's fully automatic. Go to 12:00 into the video.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The operative phrase is, "in the right hands."
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Thoughts on the Practicality of Pistol Caliber Carbine?”
- Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:59 pm
- Forum: Rifles & Shotguns
- Topic: Thoughts on the Practicality of Pistol Caliber Carbine?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 9153
Re: Thoughts on the Practicality of Pistol Caliber Carbine?
- Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:45 pm
- Forum: Rifles & Shotguns
- Topic: Thoughts on the Practicality of Pistol Caliber Carbine?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 9153
Re: Thoughts on the Practicality of Pistol Caliber Carbine?
I wanted a short, quick, semi-auto rifle in .44Mag. I think Ruger used to make one.
I ended up getting a Mini-14 in .223. (I did consider - am still considering - a lever action .44, maybe a Marlin.)
I've seen a 9mm AR that took Uzi magazines. It was pretty cool, but the only advantage I could see was reduced ammo costs for some fun plinking.
I've also seen a contraption that you attach to a Glock frame and this thing becomes the stock and barrel of a carbine.
I ended up getting a Mini-14 in .223. (I did consider - am still considering - a lever action .44, maybe a Marlin.)
I've seen a 9mm AR that took Uzi magazines. It was pretty cool, but the only advantage I could see was reduced ammo costs for some fun plinking.
I've also seen a contraption that you attach to a Glock frame and this thing becomes the stock and barrel of a carbine.