TexasCHLforum.com

Like all the posters have mentioned, both Glock and Sig make quality pistols, no argument there. Personally I go with Sig because they fit my hand better, which allows me to shoot a lot better with them, but that is personal and you should try both out to determine which one is better for you. But, the 220 is definitely not a tiny gun. I own both the 220 and 220 Carry, and even the Carry model is pretty thick and hefty.

I happen to like DA/SA. Again, this is a personal preference issue, but I also belive it is just a matter of practice. These days doing a DA/SA double tap I can darn near put the second bullet in the first hole. To me, having to "know" two trigger pulls is a non-issue, but if you don't plan to practice with whatever you decide to carry, it won't make much of a difference whether it's Glock or Sig.

Since some people have voiced concerns of magazine capacity for the P220, may I ask if you are 100% on carrying in .45ACP? If I may suggest a move to .40S&W, then I would highly recommend the P229, which would allow you higher capacity mags. Slimmer than the P220 and gosh darn it I actually shoot even better with the P229.

I think the best advice is to try them both out if possible, find out what is more comfortable in your hand, what you are comfortable with carrying, and after you make your decision practice practice practice.

just my 2 cents