Nope. Prior to the MPA, you could carry in your car as long as you were traveling. For decades, the courts begged the Legislature to define "traveling" and they wouldn't do it until 2005. Some local DAs, most notably Chuck Rosenthal, thought that they could do whatever they wanted to and as a consequense the MPA became law in 2007.mr.72 wrote:Actually, Byron, I think it is the other way around. Prior to the MPA, you may have needed the CHL to carry in your car.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “CC on private property?”
- Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:08 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: CC on private property?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1464
Re: CC on private property?
- Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:01 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: CC on private property?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1464
Re: CC on private property?
That's a bit like trying to play on both sides of the fence. I can't see how you can have a CHL on one hand and claim "Motorist Protection Act" when it suits you. If you have a CHL, you don't need the MPA because you carry under the authority of your licence.
But we do need to get that parking lot law passed.
But we do need to get that parking lot law passed.