SenileDavid wrote:People may argue about non legal 30.06 signs all they want due to the lettering was not correct size or what-have-you. Truth is IF you want to nit-pick and defiantly carry anyway when the sign is clearly at the entrance in plain view and you get busted let’s say for example you're weapon was printing or what not, it IS considered UNLAWFUL CARRY and you will (or could) have your license revoked. Because to the Criminal District Attorney the lettering size won't amount to crap... the sign was there plain and simple.
Of course it will be concealed... so what’s the worry? It's all up to the individual and if he/she wants to take the gamble.
My recommendation would be find a store that sells same product or whatever that doesn't have 30.06 signs and shop there and write a letter to the owner or corporate office expressing your discontent.
Someone missed this thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=12754&hilit=bedford&start=105" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; wherin this bit of news came out:
WildBill » 07 Jun 2010 10:07
WildBill wrote:I just received an email from the Bedford Police Chief. He stated that the DA declined to prosecute, based on the wording (not being exactly as it states in the statute) of, not only the sign posted outside the building, but also the wording in the hospital employee policy manual.MedicMan218 wrote:
Any word on what happened to the RN's case?I am also curious, but most of the time we never hear the outcome of such cases. Unless something about the story is sensational, they usually disappear after the original story. There was probably much more discussion on this forum than was ever in the news.
