57Coastie wrote:I would submit that this question has been grossly oversimplified here. There is more to it than just where Obama was born. The Constitution provides in Art. II, Sec. 2, that the president must be a "...natural born citizen...." (Plus some other limitations no longer applicable, since those limited thereby are no longer living.)
It doesn't say he just has to be a "citizen," nor does it say he just has to be a "native born citizen." It says nothing explicitly about where his parents had to have been born, or whether or not they even had to be citizens of the U.S. It does not even explicitly say that the president himself must have been born in the U.S.
The question then comes down to, "What is meant by the term 'natural born citizen?'" Or is the question, "What did the term 'natural born citizen' mean to the framers of the Constitution?"
If one researches this question, really the only one which matters, he will find judges, lawyers, professors, historians, etc., etc., all over the place.
Notwithstanding that professional confusion, the "Birthers" appear to know the answer. And some of our members here appear to know the answer.
In any event, if one doesn't understand what the question is, how can his answer be correct, other than by accident?
I assure you that yours truly shares this dilemma, and he is not ready to put his opinion in writing, as it is so uncertain.
Jim