How'd you know I was gonna' say that?speedsix wrote:...having spoken to one legislator who helped draft 30.06, I know that their intention was that we know EXACTLY where we stand...and be able to confidently follow the letter of the law...safely...
...as often happens...there are those more bold(foolhardy) who say to ignore the law...and those more timid who say to leave a lot of leeway and don't live by the letter of the law...neither have the benefit of the protection of the law as it was intended...to give those who want to restrict our carrying a mark to hit...if they don't hit it...we get to carry...if they do go to the trouble to follow the law...we don't...
...what's going to happen to us if WE fail to live up to the letter of the law...we're punished...
...my choice is that if THEY fail to live up to the letter of the law...they get ignored...
...and before he says it: CONCEALED IS CONCEALED...that's why we don't have test cases yet...
