You make a good point worth mentioning again. Part of the reason I am not having problems may very well be my carry choice. My usual companion is a Kahr PM9 in a don hume IWB. Very small weapon and easy to conceal. My second carry weapon is a glock 27 in a supertuck IWB. Not as small as the Kahr, but still not full sized. Both stay well secured between my waist band and body. Thanks again. Good luck in your choice of belt/holster/weapon. I have a pile of holsters I tried and didn't like before settling with the three I liked. I don't want to think about total money spent before finding what I liked.fisher_of_man wrote: I'm going to be carrying a full size too...so all the help I can get in making it work, I thougth I should take...I'm sure if you carry a small weapon IWB...then it's not near as big of deal as a full size...or OWB...or several other options....
Search found 5 matches
Return to “Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman”
- Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:14 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4720
Re: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
- Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:14 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4720
Re: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
Thanks for the explanation. I can definitely relate to the part about the belt lasting longer. Excellent reasoning. heck....maybe you should look into a job selling those belts. You make a good case for them.fisher_of_man wrote:Lightning...03Lightningrocks wrote:
Not that I am trying to get anyone upset here, but the holster is what holds the gun. The belt is what holds the holster. Maybe I should clear one issue up. The belt I am talking about is made from cowhide and they are fairly firm belts. they are just as thick as the high dollar belts. I agree about not using a flimsy belt. The belt simply puts pressure on the outside of the pants, thus pushing against the holster. You are only going to tighten the belt so much before it starts cutting into your waist and getting uncomfortable. I am wondering how any belt can be tightened so much as to break under the pressure before it starts cutting your waist in half. I can tighten a no name belt just as tight as i can a fashion designer belt.
To each his own...I'll admit to buying items as fashion statements. But I have to say that I have run, moved furniture, built fences and fell down my stairs a few months back. My pistol never came out of the holster and the holster never fell out of my pants or dislodged from the belt.
Maybe it would be a different story if I used an outside the waist band holster, but I can't say much on that since I only carry inside the waist band or ankle holster.
Like I said....I'm not knocking you guys for buying expensive belts, I am honestly trying to find out if there is any legitimate reason for it. I have no doubt they are purtier.... .
I've never carried before...still in the process of getting my CHL, but here are my reasons for wanting a good belt:
1) good construction - you can by a thick belt just about anywhere. However, the gun belts (as I understand it) are two pieces of leather that are sewn together with the grain of the hide going in oppposite directions. As I understand it, the two pieces with opp direction provide a more sturdy (and durable) belt. this gives it somewhat of a "plywood" effect. Eventually any single layer leather belt will sag, but the dual leather gun belts because of the "plywood effect" won't...or you'll get many more years out of them than you would a normal belt. also, because of the way they are made, they don't have the vertical floppiness some belts have - keeping your gun and holster in close and tight where it belongs.
2) from what I understand because of the dual leather and the stiffness, you don't have to "cinch" up the belt at much as you would a single layer belt. because the construction of the belt holds up the gun...not the constriction of the belt around your waist.
3) as with any tool....one more suited to the job usually works better, has better results, and eliminates much of the headache along the way. I think that will be the case with a good gun belt too. when you start loading up stuff on your belt, a good belt that distributes the weight, can take the abuse, and was designed to carry it will make your whole experience much more enjoyable.
I've heard a bunch of people say...."you don't want to buy a $500 - $1500 gun, a $100 holster and give all that a foundation of a $10 belt". I don't know that spending more money is always the answer...but I do think that the foundation for the whole rig is something you want to get right.l I'm sure it makes more of a difference OWB than IWB because with IWB, your pants, belt, body, etc help hold the holster/gun in place. if your wal-mart belt works, then by all means, don't change. I just don't want to create a belt drawer trying to "get it right". anything I have ever gotten that is specifically customized to the purpose it was intended for "usually" works better and last longer...I'm hoping thats the case with a good gun belt....
just my thoughts...and not any actually carry experience to back it up...but after all my reading thru many forums...I've decided it would be best for me to get a good belt from the start.
FOM
- Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:38 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4720
Re: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
pedalman wrote:Here's a good reason:03Lightningrocks wrote:I use a Walmart belt. i think it was about 25 bucks and it works just fine. i carry inside the waist band anyway, so I am not convinced a 100 dollar belt is needed. Is there something I am not considering here?
http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... 23&t=19394" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Not that I am trying to get anyone upset here, but the holster is what holds the gun. The belt is what holds the holster. Maybe I should clear one issue up. The belt I am talking about is made from cowhide and they are fairly firm belts. they are just as thick as the high dollar belts. I agree about not using a flimsy belt. The belt simply puts pressure on the outside of the pants, thus pushing against the holster. You are only going to tighten the belt so much before it starts cutting into your waist and getting uncomfortable. I am wondering how any belt can be tightened so much as to break under the pressure before it starts cutting your waist in half. I can tighten a no name belt just as tight as i can a fashion designer belt.
To each his own...I'll admit to buying items as fashion statements. But I have to say that I have run, moved furniture, built fences and fell down my stairs a few months back. My pistol never came out of the holster and the holster never fell out of my pants or dislodged from the belt.
Maybe it would be a different story if I used an outside the waist band holster, but I can't say much on that since I only carry inside the waist band or ankle holster.
Like I said....I'm not knocking you guys for buying expensive belts, I am honestly trying to find out if there is any legitimate reason for it. I have no doubt they are purtier.... .
- Mon Oct 27, 2008 4:54 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4720
Re: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
My walmart belt holds my gun amd holster right where I want it. That is why I am wondering how spending more money will hold it better. Some of the deals with gun nut mania seem to be like buying starbucks coffee. Pay extra for the name is how it seems at times. I can see where spending more on a gun or holster will make a difference, sometimes, but the law of diminishing returns will kick in real quick with a belt.Liberty wrote:A good gun belt will hold the gun annd holster right wear you want it. and not move.03Lightningrocks wrote:I use a Walmart belt. i think it was about 25 bucks and it works just fine. i carry inside the waist band anyway, so I am not convinced a 100 dollar belt is needed. Is there something I am not considering here?
- Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:45 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4720
Re: Carry Belt - crossbreed vs. comp-tac vs. beltman
I use a Walmart belt. i think it was about 25 bucks and it works just fine. i carry inside the waist band anyway, so I am not convinced a 100 dollar belt is needed. Is there something I am not considering here?