TexasCHLforum.com

jmra wrote:

Abraham wrote:Four score and seven threads ago, lunatics brought forth on this website, a new era conceived of re-posting madness.

Abe

At least we're not chopping down trees. These posts are 100% green.

sjfcontrol wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

jmra wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

Ameer wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

jmra wrote:

. , sigh...

..

Merry Christmas!

............................
............................
............................

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_Tannenbaum" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Put an angel on top

jmra wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

Ameer wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

jmra wrote:

. , sigh...

..

Merry Christmas!

............................
............................
............................

sjfcontrol wrote:

Ameer wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

jmra wrote:

. , sigh...

..

jmra wrote:

See, isn't it more obvious now? I am agreeing with the jmra agree post.

[quote="sjfcontrol"

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

jmra wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote: To what?

If he had reposted the original post, you would know.

I know, right?

Right!

Maybe he agrees with the meaning of life, the universe, and everything?

I know I do.

Well, who doesn't?

Who doesn't what?

Read the quoted part to figure it out -- I forget.

See! Abraham was right after all.

No, he wasn't. (Wait, right about what?)


Exactly my point. Look at all the confusion. And now I have forgotten what I agreed to.

Tic Tac wrote:

Abraham wrote:Why do this?

Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.

Rant off.

I hardly ever see people reposting others' stuff on a different forum but I agree that could muddly the waters without the context.

Many threads get into several discussions that have little to do with each other. It then becomes necessary to copy which post or series of posts one is responding to. What if it was a thread where one of the forum libtards were responding about how much they like licking sweat off obamas feet? Posting ,without posting who I was agreeing to, might cause the forum libtard to think we needed two servings of obama foot sweat.

sunny beach wrote:

WildBill wrote:

Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

It's free and easy.

I use only recycled electrons so it's environmentally friendly.

You have me thinking. Maybe a carbon tax on re-posting. First we would have to prove it is contributing to global warming, but it is pretty easy to blame almost anything for that these days.

sjfcontrol wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Abraham wrote:Thanks to you all for proving my point.

You've done a Mah-Vell-Us job.

Rinse and repeat.

You forgot "lather"...

Yep, he sure did. Lather... Then rinse and repeat.

RogueUSMC wrote:you suppose ta be repose...lak dis

gringo pistolero wrote:Was HU a flight attendant? viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67639" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

03Lightningrocks wrote:

RogueUSMC wrote: It's HU that is on first...

In before da lock.

RogueUSMC wrote:It's HU that is on first...

jmra wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

jmra wrote:

fishman wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

fishman wrote:

jmra wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Silliness, just plain silliness! Business must be slow....or something?

Maybe this is the problem?
[youtube][/youtube]

I'm an old country boy, but I enjoyed that, especially with the orchestra playing too. Haven't seen that one before.

I don't know about everyone else...I am busy but still...

[youtube][/youtube]

Got any Eagles?Yep
[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]

Fixed that for you.

Thanks

My Pleasure.

jmra wrote:

fishman wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

fishman wrote:

jmra wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Silliness, just plain silliness! Business must be slow....or something?

Maybe this is the problem?
[youtube][/youtube]

I'm an old country boy, but I enjoyed that, especially with the orchestra playing too. Haven't seen that one before.

I don't know about everyone else...I am busy but still...

[youtube][/youtube]

Got any Eagles?Yep
[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]

Fixed that for you.