Return to “Is it worth the additional money?”
I think the point was the fact that you are mistaken about there being no safety on the Glock pistol.glbedd53 wrote:So what's your point? I never said it would fire without something pulling the trigger. My point is that 5.5 lb is a little light for a gun without a safety.
ETA: I assumed you were referencing bdickens's post...glbedd53 wrote:...I still don't feel good about a chambered auto with no safety.
That LEO was negligent. That's not the fault of the Glock. Are you saying the gun 'just went off'?driver8 wrote:I have a Glock and I won't carry it chambered. There have been accidental discharge of Glocks without violating rule 3. I remember at least one that was well documented by a police officer. His departments armorer was so skeptical he didn't even bother to go to the range with it. He just took it out into the parking lot and promptly shot a round into the pavement. A 5.5 lb trigger is a little to light for a gun with no safety. It seems like I remember when Glocks first came out most gun experts were saying Glocks required more training than guns with safeties. I believed it then and I believe it now. If it didn't hold so many rounds and it wasn't so accurate I would get rid of mine.