TexasCHLforum.com

HighVelocity wrote:Ever fire a 357 Sig without ear protection? I don't recommend it.

Well yeah, but surely the only time you're going to fire one without ear protection is in a self defence situation anyway ... and that goes for all guns and all calibers...

TxD wrote:

DoubleJ wrote:I keep 9rounds in my 1911...

And everyone knows that 9 230 gr 45ACP flying ashtrays out of John Browning's finest are more than equal to 18 9mm mosquito mashers out of a plastic watergun or a crunchenticker.

This of course is only applicable when fired from the Weaver stance.

And what about this ..?

I'm amazed no one has yet pointed out that if this scenario is an argument against the carrying of a revolver, then it's also an argument against the revered 1911.

I seem to recall reading that something like, um what were the figures again? That in gunfights, people hit their target only half the time or something? Well if that's the case, it only takes one missed round .. and your 1911 has become a 'revolver'.

agbullet2k1 wrote:

TxD wrote:Reminds me of that old math quiz.
If there are six crows on a fence and you shoot one.
How many are left?

Had an argument with a teacher once who swore that the answer was 0. I just simply couldn't convince her that the one that was shot didn't leave with the others.

Well, no. It fell to the ground dead. So it's no longer on the fence. So the answer is 0.