I see your line of reasoning and that's a fair point as well.johnson0317 wrote:I am not sure that would have been the best solution either. One modus operandi of burgulars is to ring the bell and knock on the door to see if someone answers. When they do not, they slip around the back and break in there. Here is the problem with that...then you have a guy in your house you may have to shoot. I would have let him know I was home sooner, and tried to get a decent description of him for the police. How bad would you feel having killed a guy you might well have stopped before things went bad?Excaliber wrote:Unfortunately it sounds like you let a great opportunity to have him identified and possibly arrested for other crimes on the basis of evidence recovered from those scenes or in his possession at the time of your incident slip away.
If you had called the police and stayed on the line while he prowled around your home, they most likely would have arrived in time to make hi the star of his very own interview show.
You can talk big all you want about what is going to happen to someone who invades your castle, but you have to live with it too. I would want to be sure I prevented it if I could have. If I try, and he busts in, then I think I will sleep a whole lot better at night knowing he made the move that resulted in his death.
RJ
Most burglars make a quick attempt to see if anyone's home and then get right to the breakin part.
From your account, it sounds like the actor in your case was having trouble making up his mind to go ahead and provided an opportunity to use that time to have him intercepted.
I realize I'm looking at that through my LEO background. The way you handled it was by definition fine because it had a wholly successful outcome - your home was not broken into and you didn't have to use deadly force.