We'll soon see if safety is the goal, or if it's another backdoor attack on businesses that support the second amendment.Excaliber wrote:The solution is not in the hands of the police - the city council needs to amend the ordinance so it no longer requires a health hazard in the name of safety.psijac wrote:Appereantly they upgraded their backstop in a manner that the City of Houston circa 1974 does not approve of
http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/01/14/64512.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Top Gun under fire (figuratively speaking this time)”
- Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:28 am
- Forum: Shooting Ranges
- Topic: Top Gun under fire (figuratively speaking this time)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3571
Re: Top Gun under fire (figuratively speaking this time)
- Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:27 am
- Forum: Shooting Ranges
- Topic: Top Gun under fire (figuratively speaking this time)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3571
Re: Top Gun under fire (figuratively speaking this time)
The solution is not in the hands of the police - the city council needs to amend the ordinance so it no longer requires a health hazard in the name of safety.psijac wrote:Appereantly they upgraded their backstop in a manner that the City of Houston circa 1974 does not approve of
http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/01/14/64512.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;