I tend to agree. My guess is that they would ask to immediately escort you to to your car and conduct one of the searches that you thought had never been previously conducted.ELB wrote:You are thinking like a reasonable man, not Corporate Security. If he did this, he just identified himself as a man who carries a gun, which is to say, a threat or a potential threat, from their (and their insurer's) perspective. If they didn't just let him go immediately, if only on another pretext, I am sure the corporate "we can search your car" policy would be quickly and regularly enforced.joe817 wrote:...
What about going in and talking to Corporate Security and telling them ...
Just my opinion.
I am afraid that single person efforts to change a corporate policies like this (including non-compliant gun-buster signs) just result in either identifying oneself as a "problem" or chinks in the policy that can be quickly "remedied." Occasionally someone finds a reasonable person in the management who can actually change the policy, but I fear those are few and far between.
I would not bring up the subject.