Return to “Scalia takes Kagan to gun range, sources say”
I suspect that he was simply quoting Bill Clinton.The Annoyed Man wrote:But that wasn't his point, and you know it. He was using that as a justification for banning AK47s. Are you in agreement with his viewpoint in that regard?nitrogen wrote:He's right. Then again, if you can hit a duck with an AK-47, you're a better hunter than I am.glbedd53 wrote:Bill Clinton said "you don't need an AK-47 to hunt ducks".
I don't see the point. Taking a wild guess I would imagine that as a Justice they would both rate Secret Service bodyguards. As a result it is easy for people in such positions of power and used to being protected to become detached from the reality that you and I might experience.TXlaw1 wrote:He needs to get a real self-defense weapon into her hand and take her into a neighborhood where it is an equalizer so she can feel what the 2nd Amendment is really about - not shooting clay pigeons as a rich man's club! Maybe Justice Thomas would be a better guide to such a location and the need for real protection.G.A. Heath wrote:Maybe he's trying to ensure the next RKBA decision is a 6-3 split by ensuring that the newest justice has a vested interest in gun rights.
