There is more than one way to be denied.
Direct, in which you recieve a written notice because you do not meet the eligibility requirements.
Implicit, in which the department fails to act within the alloted time laid out within the statute.
Texas is a shall issue state, so the department can't just not issue the license.
So the department has to keep processing the application until complete.
If Charles says there is legal recourse (and the way I read the statues there is) then I am sure there is.
Charles has had a large part in drafting the laws that are being debated, so show a little respect.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Talked to the office of the Chairman of the Licensing and”
- Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:10 am
- Forum: The "Waiting Room"
- Topic: Talked to the office of the Chairman of the Licensing and
- Replies: 89
- Views: 15140
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:26 pm
- Forum: The "Waiting Room"
- Topic: Talked to the office of the Chairman of the Licensing and
- Replies: 89
- Views: 15140
Re: Talked to the office of the Chairman of the Licensing and
The local background is not even required to issue a license. They are done at "the sole discretion of the department". DPS needs to eliminate the local background checks and rely solely on the electronic database.infoman wrote:At the current time, only comissioned officers can work on background checks, and that's congress's decision.
GC 411.176 (b) The director's designee as needed shall conduct an additional
criminal history record check of the applicant and an investigation of
the applicant's local official records to verify the accuracy of the application
materials. The scope of the record check and the investigation
are at the sole discretion of the department, except that the director's
designee shall complete the record check and investigation not later
than the 60th day after the date the department receives the application
materials.