TexasCHLforum.com

Purplehood wrote:

Furyataurus wrote:

srothstein wrote:Keith,

The answer to both questions is yes. If they tell us the money will be mostly alcohol sales, the permit is written as 51%. And it would take a thorough investigation to prove that they did not get 51% and overturn the permit decision. To make a difference in a court case for unlawfully carrying, it would take even more to prove that they deliberately lied on the application. If they submitted what they truly anticipated sales to be and the decision were made on that basis, the law would apply since it specifically says it is the TABC decision that counts.

That is what is messed up. IMO, they have to PROVE that 51% IS derived from alcohol sales and from what I've seen it wouldn't be more than 45%.

How did you figure that one out?

srothstein wrote:Keith,

The answer to both questions is yes. If they tell us the money will be mostly alcohol sales, the permit is written as 51%. And it would take a thorough investigation to prove that they did not get 51% and overturn the permit decision. To make a difference in a court case for unlawfully carrying, it would take even more to prove that they deliberately lied on the application. If they submitted what they truly anticipated sales to be and the decision were made on that basis, the law would apply since it specifically says it is the TABC decision that counts.