TexasCHLforum.com

After reading that section (which I'll admit I hadn't done in quite awhile), it appears to me then that if the subject has not come up verbally, and only communicated in a written employment policy (via employee handbook, wording NOT in accordance with 30.06), an employee should be fine within the law to carry with a CHL. However, that employee would place their employment status at risk (if discovered) due to violating company policy.

Thanks. That's what I thought.

I'm pretty sure that an employer's "no weapons" policy would constitute effective notice to an employee with a CHL, even with the absence of 30.06 signage. Is this correct? I've heard it argued that without the 30.06, a CHL holder carrying at their place of employment (with such a policy) it is merely a violation of company policy (and therefore you risk being fired if discovered), but not illegally trespassing. I believe, reluctantly, that the policy would prohibit employees (but not visitors!) from carrying concealed with a CHL.

Comments?