Search found 4 matches
Return to “ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules”
- Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:49 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules
- Replies: 155
- Views: 79866
Re: ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules
I am holding on any action by me/corporate ID till we get some clarity from Courts and Congress.
- Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:48 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules
- Replies: 155
- Views: 79866
Re: ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules
Technically, you can. You still have to file form-1 to re-manufacture a pistol into a rifle.Malawler wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:13 pm Can I increase the barrel length by permanent attachment of a muzzle device to turn my "pistol" into a true rifle?
My specific example is a 12 inch 9mm. Since 9mm and 223 barrels are both threaded 1/2X28, I am considering permanently putting on an XM177 flash hider.
- Wed Jan 25, 2023 11:38 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules
- Replies: 155
- Views: 79866
Re: ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules
After the loss in the bump stock case, there are millions of dollars to be paid in damages.
The new ruler stipulate the destruction of properties in 100s of millions of dollars. If they lose thi rule in court, it is catastrophic and political suicide.
The new ruler stipulate the destruction of properties in 100s of millions of dollars. If they lose thi rule in court, it is catastrophic and political suicide.
- Sun Sep 11, 2022 12:10 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules
- Replies: 155
- Views: 79866
Re: ATF Released New Proposed Pistol Brace Rules
ATF cannot say it was legal to own, and now it is felony not to register. Otherwise, it was allowing people to commit felonies, knowingly and willingly.
In addition, if they sent a letter that an item is federally legal to own, and now it is not, then a lawyer can argue, who passed the law to change the first decision?
In addition, if they sent a letter that an item is federally legal to own, and now it is not, then a lawyer can argue, who passed the law to change the first decision?