Sure i would not worry about it. i will present ID/CHL/OCL as`required. Say a known felon was seen OC someone who knew the felon called and reported the guy, felon with a gun. There is a need for the responding LEOs to stip and ID said man with a gun.
Another issue is disarming the OCer by LEO. if CHLer can be disarmed why not OCer in normal contact by LEO?
I watched video on the net for a guy who was called by his girfriend to come and video tape a normal traffic stop, the guy came and he was OC and LEO did not like the interference and called for backup and the backup LEO had a hard time to ask for ID from the OC. It was not fun and that could have escalated easily.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?”
- Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:00 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12503
- Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:25 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12503
Re: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?
In Unlic carrry, can a LEO stop and ask for ID and check if the OCer is not a felon? Or do you allow the violent felons to OC?anygunanywhere wrote:Unlicensed, definitely.
Good point C-dub.
Anygunanywhere
- Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:56 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12503
Re: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?
I vote licensed OC. I do not want felons and violent crimnals to OC, periods. LEOs can check OC/CHL lic with no need to have an positive proof state issued id and and do on-sight background check. But I am not sure if this is an issue for LEOs