Search found 3 matches

by Beiruty
Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:41 am
Forum: Shooting Ranges
Topic: Why no city operated ranges?
Replies: 23
Views: 3949

Re: Why no city operated ranges?

gigag04 wrote:Ranges are not big money.

That and liability.
I beg to differ. On good weather day, hundreds of shooters are lined up on range that I used to visit, Garlands Public Range The word "Public" is goofy, it is privately owned and managed business. The rumor is the Bullet Trap of Plano, is opening a new range in Mickenny. At $20 per entry that is quite good money.
by Beiruty
Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:18 pm
Forum: Shooting Ranges
Topic: Why no city operated ranges?
Replies: 23
Views: 3949

Re: Why no city operated ranges?

loadedliberal wrote:I think the issue is liability, cities do not want to be on the hook if some ya-hoo gets hurt and wants to sue.
Isn't true that one can't sue the government for more than $200,000 or $250,000? This is not big deal. $1,000,000 insurance liability is not that big deal for medium size operation.
by Beiruty
Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:49 pm
Forum: Shooting Ranges
Topic: Why no city operated ranges?
Replies: 23
Views: 3949

Why no city operated ranges?

Shooting ranges is big business and very very profitable. Cities operate swimming pools, libraries, basket ball, tennis and track fields, parks, why not shooting ranges?

City residents can have discounts and yearly membership at affordable rates. Guest are all welcomed. Big events IDPA IPSC, and Cowboy matches and tactical matches are also an option. What a better option for CHLer instructors to have a place to teach and train?

I wished I was on city board to raise this project.

Return to “Why no city operated ranges?”