I agree there must be some process for a liscense to carry publically. This I have no problem with.
I have a problem with this being a one way street. If I in anyway make a mistake as mundane as not putting the picture exactly in the middle of the cute little photo holder, the packet gets sent back to me and is delayed.
I think that the pictures should be made free at the drivers liscense office along with the finger prints. That is another issue with me. Why do they need another set of fingerprints? They did not change in the last four years.
Since you must have an address for the liscense, I am sure the DPS can look me up if there are any further questions.
The other beef I have with the liscense system is the need to carry the liscense everywhere you go armed. Police have an instant check on their computers to verify if I am who I say I am. If not, then those things need to be removed from police cars as being a waste of tax payer money.
I am all for the police having everything they need to do their job, but if it is redundant, then why make an issue over something that may be resolved with a computer data query.
I would also like to see open carry made legal and without permit. Those that do not wish to get a permit could carry, and only those that would feel comfortable socially and tactically to do so, and the 2nd Ammendment would be restored.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Texas CHL renewal Mailing tomorrow;”
- Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:21 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Texas CHL renewal Mailing tomorrow;
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1234
- Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:02 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Texas CHL renewal Mailing tomorrow;
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1234
Texas CHL renewal Mailing tomorrow;
I finally completed all of the mundane things for renewal on my Texas CHL. I will be mailing it tomorrow.
A few things occurred to me as I completed this process. Why is it that drivers liscenses are so easy to obtain? I think that those types of liscenses should be just as difficult to obtain as CHL. Think about it; people as young as sixteen years of age are earning drivers lisccenses to operate 3000 pound machines that drive in the neighborhood of 70 mph on the highways.
Is this not as great or greater responsibility than carrying a concealed handgun? I think it is. I also think that the other liscenses should be scrutinized as much as CHLs because the state is allowing the applicant to drive vehicles on public roadways that are just as dangerous if not more than the gun fight we probably won't see in our lifetimes.
What does everyone else on this board think?
A few things occurred to me as I completed this process. Why is it that drivers liscenses are so easy to obtain? I think that those types of liscenses should be just as difficult to obtain as CHL. Think about it; people as young as sixteen years of age are earning drivers lisccenses to operate 3000 pound machines that drive in the neighborhood of 70 mph on the highways.
Is this not as great or greater responsibility than carrying a concealed handgun? I think it is. I also think that the other liscenses should be scrutinized as much as CHLs because the state is allowing the applicant to drive vehicles on public roadways that are just as dangerous if not more than the gun fight we probably won't see in our lifetimes.
What does everyone else on this board think?