Nice to hear.CompVest wrote:Had the opportunity to shot a brand new out of the box Para today. It ran like a champ not one hiccup. All I did was put a couple of drops of oil on it. However, when compared to the STI it feels like a unshaped lump of steel. It didn't have any touch appeal or ergonomics to speak of. The trigger was just okay not nearly as light a smooth as an STI.
After shooting a double stack Para I wouldn't NOT own one but I wouldn't buy it either.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Opinions on double stack 1911's such as Para Ordnance.”
- Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:39 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Opinions on double stack 1911's such as Para Ordnance.
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2276
Re: Opinions on double stack 1911's such as Para Ordnance.
- Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:47 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Opinions on double stack 1911's such as Para Ordnance.
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2276
Re: Opinions on double stack 1911's such as Para Ordnance.
My uncle carries a a 4" single stack model that has been very reliable and looks and feels as good as any other mid grade 1911 I have felt. I don't mean to knock it by calling it mid grade, but its not a Rock Island and its not a Wilson Combat...so it falls in the middle. I am not a huge fan of the LDA trigger, but it is smooth and reliable. I like the crispness of the single action on some of the older models. I have been looking into one of their 9mm models b/c I can not bring myself to spend Kimber or STI money yet.
STI does however make some double stack 1911 models and they are made in Texas!
STI does however make some double stack 1911 models and they are made in Texas!