Return to “Single Stack Glock”
DoubleJ wrote:It was filled with all the hopes and dreams and puppy dog tails that were saved during the The Great Prohibition of our era.C-dub wrote:Really? So, what did they do with all that space in the G19 magazine from 1994-2004? Nothing?shootthesheet wrote:No, cause Glock does not make a single stack 9mm handgun.C-dub wrote:Are there mags from the 10 round ban period in 9mm that are single stack for the Glocks?
I hear a few unicorns regrew their horns too...
I bought and sold a PPS in 9mm it was bigger than the PF9 and smaller than a Glock but not a pocket gun.RHenriksen wrote:Walther PPS. Having the choice of 6, 7, and 8 rd magazines is a bonus.
I have never shot a PF9, but they sure feel good in my hand. It is on my list of easily concealable 9mm handguns. I just cannot bring myself to rely on a .380. If am going to be down on round count I want to have a little bit more punch than the .380. I have heard nothing but good things about Kel-tec customer service and reliability but will admit I am not impressed with their fit and finish, but they beat the price point...PeteCamp wrote:I have almost every Glock and more often than not, I reach for the G36 when I need concealment and power. The ONLY limitation is 6 rounds in the magazine - BUT it is a .45. With 2 spare mags I can have 19 rounds available. The 36 is smaller than any other Glock in the dimensions that matter for concealed carry. It is very accurate due to the double recoil spring which keeps the barrel locked up after firing a bit longer than other Glocks.
Now if someone would only hear the cries of G36 owners and come out with some higher cap mags for reloads, we would be set.
BTW, I have a Ruger SR9C (9mm) and it is a very easy to conceal weapon. But I guess the king of small ones is the Kel Tec PF9. I carry mine a lot-even makes a great backup. Lots of people smirk about Kel Tecs who probably don't own one or have never shot one. Their loss. Good luck finding what you want.