TexasCHLforum.com

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I deal with psychiatrists in many of my cases and have for decades. Most cases that involve psychiatrists have at least one on each side of the case, each of whom reviews the same medical records and evidence, yet they come to opposite opinions. The jury is then left to guess which one, if either, is correct. The mental health sciences are far too imprecise to use as a basis for denying anyone their Second Amendment right, unless the psychiatrist and the judge will go so far as to institutionalize the person, or appoint a guardian. It would be far too easy for a court to decide "he's too crazy to own a gun, but other than that, he can function independently."
Chas.