Liberty wrote:Seriously though, why would anyone care about a what something looks like when its going to spend its life pretty much concealed? It seems a lot of gun owners like their guns pretty. Nothing wrong with that, I just could never understand the idea of form over function.flintknapper wrote:Venus Pax wrote:I don't have a problem with an ugly gun. I have a problem with a gun that doesn't work properly and won't get me out of trouble.
No argument there!
Of course..my 1911 works properly, but its up to me get myself out of trouble.
I'm just "gigging" the Glock owners a little , I would never trade "looks" for reliability, and "beauty is in the eye of the beholder".
On 1911's I only know what I've learned on this site, but it seems as though they are a expencive finicky design. The 1911 fans themselves have convinced me that they aren't for me. I'll take cheap and reliable any day... Pretty doesn't even factor in.
I guess its a "fault" of mine.
But basically.. its like my wife. She's 100% reliable, good hearted, etc, etc, but it doesn't hurt that she's good looking too.
I guess I'm saying, if I can have both (function and looks), then thats what I want. Speaking in gun terms of course.