I think what he meant by the comment was that we, as CHL holders, know the limitations on alcohol and would not jeopardize out status for a beer or two as he stated that CHLer's were typically of the highest law abiding citizens.LCP_Dogg wrote:First off, good for you - thank you for doing that and stepping up!
I can't believe he said this - Anyways, I don't know where I lie with this. Part of me likes this law because it prevents reckless CHL holders from getting wasted and potentially discharging their firearm (on purpose or not).txfour wrote:He stated that the 51% and no carry for a CHL was ridiculous to begin with.
However, I also dislike the fact that if a CHL holder goes into an establishment like this, unarmed, then the trip to/from the vehicle, the time to dis/re-arm, etc, all adds up to quite a bit of time being more "vulnerable", especially since you could possibly accidentally brandish said firearm while attempting to secure/store it in said vehicle.
I guess that is why I avoid these places now. I'm still on the fence of whether I like the 51% or not, but either way, I try to avoid it at all costs.
I would imagine the 51% law was created purely to offset temptation to drink and carry a firearm. I dislike it for one reason, in my opinion, you are are more likely to be in a dangerous situation at a bar (and that may be why it was written too - to keep you out of harms way) than many other places you will go. I'm like you. I just avoid the places all together.