Return to “The person below me....”
True! My daily post count skyrocketed when I finally went from lurking via phone and posting via PC to posting from both.apostate wrote:The person below me is reading this forum on a smart phone.
False. 86 the gin, vermouth, and olives. I'll take mine with bourbon. . . straight (or a splash of water).SlickTX wrote:The person below me likes his martini shaken, not stirred.
False. I got the last six $14 P-Mags at Cabela's on the Monday morning after the shooting. (Well, my lovely wife did that for me.)snakeyez78 wrote:The person below me paid $100 for each of their p-mags
True-ish. I considered selling to consolidate calibers. . . the effect of which would enable me to buy more ammo and stockpile it faster.Z0Tex wrote:The person below me has considered selling a firearm from their collection just so they could buy ammo for one of their other guns.
Ohhhhhhhhh. True. Man, is it too early to open my 90 minute Dogfishhead??? Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Must resist temptation. Must wait. Must stick with coffee. . .7075-T7 wrote:True. More Donut less air.
The person below me likes IPA's.
False. It was a 1994 Buick Century with 235,000 miles and a busted transmission. I got $500 for it from Classic Chevrolet on a trade the week it died.Gameover wrote:False...it was my 9th grade math teacher
The person below me regrets selling there first car?
False. There's a lot to be worried about in those EOs. How do you fight being on the banned list? Where's your due process? It sounds like they're going to launch an all out indoctrination propaganda war against guns in the schools and on TV using "studies" funded by the CDC as evidence. Most of his proposals will increase our deficit. It looks like he's shredding HIPAA and other privacy laws. He could do something with insurance coverage for gun owners or try to make it illegal t take your kids out shooting. They'll have schools, doctors, and anybody else they can think of identifying gun owners. And, to top it off, there are far too many "conservatives" who don't know what they're talking about and are mindlessly giving up ground on the news. Lastly, none of these ideas as currently constructed would have prevented any of these crimes. These are scary times.Wodathunkit wrote:The person below me thinks we "dodged a bulet" today with the E.O. Announcement but is still worried because the administration still has plenty of bullets in their high cap "clip"....
False. I concluded it's an epistemic paradox long ago.SQLGeek wrote:The person below me lays awake at night wondering if the hokie pokie really IS what it is all about.
False, but ask me again in a week now that you've planted the idea, and this answer will be different!Wodathunkit wrote: The person below me has often thought about shooting a smiley face on a target head?
I had to Google it to make sure. If the smile on my face after shooting .357 magnum from my Smith & Wesson 340PD (Scandium J-frame) makes me guilty, I guess I'll respond with: TRUE!7075-T7 wrote:The person below me is a recoil junkie.
True, but it's 99% being an amillennialist and only 1% from the current political climate. I tend to think the former helped me not be surprised by the latter. If I could change my username, it'd be "sojourner".7075-T7 wrote:The person below me is an optimistic pessimist. (I'm positive things will only get worse.)
False, but I was surprised a few years ago when they actually defended some conservative Christians.RottenApple wrote:The person below me is a card-carrying member of the ACLU.