TexasCHLforum.com

RJGold wrote:I really appreciate all of the input on this.

I have a follow up question for the M1A folks:

Is there any benefit (or advantage) of going with a vintage (of some certain year model) M1A vs those available now (current year model)?

Just curious if there's anything better about an old one than a new one (other than nostalgia).

Thanks again for all the input.

https://www.wideners.com/itemview.cfm?dir=700|1076" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The main alternative is going with other manufactuers like LRB or Fulton Armory over Springfield. The others are going to be more expensive. I don't know if the difference is worth it or not.

The M1A is a reliable and accurate platform. However, it is really at its best using iron sights. There are scope mounts that work well, but for the first 300 yards or so, you would be hard pressed to out perform the iron sights with a scope. I personally think it is also a more robust rifle to take punishment and keep working and eat any ammo new or surplus.

To me the AR10 is ideal to mount a scope and you can easily make your own build. It might be lighter and might have the potential for greater long range accuracy if that is your goal. In my experience (I don't own one) they are pickier on ammo, but you control what you buy. My brothers rifle would not work well with some surplus I have. Other rifles might do fine. If you are used to the AR platform, it might be the ideal rifle for you.

Overall, the difference is likely minimal for the conditions most of use shoot in. Just my 2 cents.