TexasCHLforum.com

atxtj wrote:I've got a seecamp LWS .380, but I have no experience with the other pistols. I've got several hundred rounds through it with no issues what so ever. Accuracy is good for such a small piece, though I rarely practice with it past 5 yards, as it is not intended for use past those ranges. What is outstanding is its craftsmanship and quality, as it is truly a hand made pistol. I would certainly recommend shooting one before purchase as the recoil on the little bugger is quite stout (and painful on the trigger finger), if you found it too much but liked the seecamp design the .32 might be a better option for you. Seecamps really are the Rolex of mouse guns, and you will not be disappointed if you decide to pick one up.

saltydog452 wrote:I've had two Seecamps and one NAA, all .32 ACP.

Supposedly, the Seecamp crew had some problems sorting out the family pecking order. Whatever the cause, quality control and cust service suffered. 'Phones went un-answered for a while. The two .32s that I had didn't want to play nice with any ammunition, recoil spring and Mag spring sgave up the ghost way too early. I'm told that that is a thing of the past now and isn't relevant. If you want to look into it, there was a Seecamp Forum out there somewhere.

The NAA Guardian has kept on ticking for about ten years now. Every few years, I swap out the mag springs and the recoil spring. So far, all that has been gratis.

Currently, the NAA is loaded with Buffalo Bore hard cast, 75 grain, RNFP at 1140 fps.

Using 'recycled' 'phone books as a tell, the Buffalo Bore functions, penetrates almost as deeply as Ball, but more than Silver Tip WW, and waay more costly. That doesn't mean much of anything other than I like shooting 'phone books in the back yard.

Your experiences may, most likely will, vary. Pay your money and roll the dice. With this Guardian, I got a winner.

salty