I agree. And maybe a few legislative "tweeks" to existing CHL law for clarity, since there seems to be noCharles L. Cotton wrote:I cannot support any change that makes it more difficult, expensive or troublesome to obtain a CHL. The trend needs to be toward less regulation, not more.
Chas.
specific case law defining certain words or phrases as currently written.
I agree TOTALLY! I'd also like to see legislation making it specifically illegal for any entity (private OR public)C-dub wrote:In no particular order other than how they came into my head.
I would like to see more enforcement or penalties from the state on places and municipalities illegally posting 30.06.
I would like a requirement that for a business to post a 30.06 sign it must be in a conspicuous place at all entrances or it is not valid.
I would like the cost lowered.
I would like the restriction on any sporting event removed.
I would not only like campus carry, but school carry. All schools!
I would like the Parking Lot bill with nothing about a fence or controlled access or any other restriction.
I would like a cookie, but my Hershey's bar with almonds will have to do. And a glass of milk.
from collecting, creating a log or data base, requiring any type of disclosure, recording in any fashion, or requesting, the personal
information of any CHL holder for ANY reason. That would include name, address etc etc etc. (excludes LEO etc for official LEO business)
Legislative action that would have some punitive penalties for municipalities that post 30.06 in areas where it
contradicts state law. Because I believe such postings are in reckless disregard of CHL (would be plaintiffs) rights.
Legislative action that would allow carry in 51% locations by CHL would be nice. However, I don't see that as happening
anytime soon. So, I'd like to see carry in 51% locations by non-imbibing (designated drivers or folks eating in a bar) CHL allowed.
I like home made brownies with a glass of cold milk.