So what about the "no refusal" thing that has been going on in the DFW area? If you refuse the breathalyzer, you are forced to submit to a blood draw. What is the best response there? And, is "no refusal" really legal?srothstein wrote:I was told by an instructor years ago that this is the correct answer. The two that stick in a drunk's mind are the beer the waiter brought and the one he took away. Counting how many times that happened is the hard part the drunk does not remember.RPB wrote:pbwalker wrote:What is it with "Two Beers"? That seems to be the universal answer to "How much have you had to drink tonight?". I see it on all the police TV shows, Cops, TruTV, etc.
Is there some magical occurrence after two beers that people generally don't want to admit to?![]()
It's that ....... two is all they "remember"
On the OP's question of whether or not to cooperate and take the SFST, it is a basic question of tactics and strategy. If you cooperate, you may be giving evidence against yourself but you are also working to give evidence for yourself. The officer may make a decision to arrest based in part on your cooperation level. So, if you do not cooperate, you are more likely to spend a night in jail. But, if you do not cooperate at all, you give the prosecutor much less evidence to use in court. You stand a better chance of winning the court case that way.
End result is that cooperation may keep you from going to jail that night while a lack of cooperation may keep you from going to jail later on.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Field sobriety test”
- Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:05 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Field sobriety test
- Replies: 103
- Views: 12955