That clarifies it. Thank you, sir!Charles L. Cotton wrote: You are correct; 30.06 signs are not enforceable on government property, but there is no statute prohibiting them from posting ineffective signs. Hopefully, this will change in a year, but I'm not holding my breath on this one. (Note: governmental agencies can post 30.06 signs in certain specified locations, such as at meetings of governmental agencies.)
You are also correct that they can prohibit employees from carrying.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Posting at State public service offices?”
- Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:53 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Posting at State public service offices?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2057
Re: CHL On Government Property
- Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:48 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Posting at State public service offices?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2057
Re: CHL On Government Property
OK, I guess my "blonde" is showing... I'm reading this as "customers can carry there" but not that they can't post. Is there a difference, legally?S&W6946 wrote: ......(d) An offense under this section is a Class A Misdeameanor.
(e) It is an exception to the application of this section that the property on which the license holder carries a handgun is owned or leased by a governmental entity and is not a premises or other place on which the license holder is prohibited from carrying the handgun under Section 46.03 or 46.035.
Or am I mis-reading this?
- Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:25 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Posting at State public service offices?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2057
Posting at State public service offices?
It's my understanding that a State agency that provides a public service, in a public access building, is not allowed to post non-CHL signs on the premises - although they are still allowed to ban employee carry. This would include TxDOT, Tx Workforce Commission, & similar agencies. Is this correct? and where can I find the specific chapter/verse that says so/no?