The smart way to do it would have been to include CoE land in the Coburn Amendment. I don't see any reason why it shouldn't have been included, but carry on land controlled by the Department of the Interior has been what has been getting press.BigBlueDodge wrote:Also, I'm curious to see if this will put some pressure on the Corp. of Engineers to change their policies. While I like the National Park, I think Corp. of Engineers affect more people in Texas than National Parks.
Search found 1 match
Return to “An about face in Congress on the National Park Bill”
- Wed May 20, 2009 4:33 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: An about face in Congress on the National Park Bill
- Replies: 34
- Views: 6180