I was afraid that would be taken wrong. Just trying to get to actual law which is what is important. No offense intended.gringo pistolero wrote:Well, OK then.jmra wrote:Don't take this wrong, but I'm not interested in what people think.
Search found 6 matches
Return to “Sign at entrance to property (not door)”
- Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:22 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16167
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:16 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16167
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
Don't take this wrong, but I'm not interested in what people think. I'm interested in the law. Gun buster signs did stop CC carry into buildings prior to 30.06, but with MPA we are not talking about entering buildings.gringo pistolero wrote:A lot of people think a gunbuster sign is 30.05 notice. IIRC, that was the impetus for 30.06 back in the 90s.jmra wrote:If that is true, then the gun buster symbol that is often found on the same sign as the 30.06 language (just above the words) would prevent carry under MPA. Can you provide a link to the portion of code that keeps me from parking in a parking lot under MPA if there is a gun buster sign at the entrance to the parking lot? Not doubting you, just want to make sure we are all on the same page.
- Tue Jun 24, 2014 2:15 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16167
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
If that is true, then the gun buster symbol that is often found on the same sign as the 30.06 language (just above the words) would prevent carry under MPA. Can you provide a link to the portion of code that keeps me from parking in a parking lot under MPA if there is a gun buster sign at the entrance to the parking lot? Not doubting you, just want to make sure we are all on the same page.bayouhazard wrote:The 30.06 requirements don't apply to MPA. Any kind of sign is good enough. No minimum size for letters, no special language, etc.JKTex wrote:Regardless, what several aren't getting is that 30.06 only pertains to CHL's. If you're not carrying under the authority of a CHL, it's moot.
- Sun Apr 20, 2014 2:06 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16167
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
Hand written on notebook paper is not close. Letters slightly smaller than 1" is close.Abraham wrote:jmra
"if it's close"...?
Would you be so kind as to elaborate?
Thanks!
- Sun Apr 20, 2014 1:09 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16167
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
Abraham wrote:But of course, mon ami.
I'm simultaneously annoyed and amused when I read posts where folks on the forum bellicosely exclaim how THEY aren't going to adhere to a 30.06 sign if it isn't absolutely perfect in every way...thus my previous bit of jocularity...
If it's close to right I go somewhere else.
- Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:17 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16167
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
I disagree. The sign states "premises". Legally premises does not include parking lots or sidewalks. It would make the buildings off limits.Divided Attention wrote:JMPHO, means you can't even be in the parking lot.