TexasCHLforum.com

My problem with 30.06 is that, to me, is wrong-ended.

I much prefer the non-30.06 signs that say the unlicensed possession of a firearm is prohibited. I see those most often in my area.

Of course, if you're carrying a weapon for nefarious purposes, you'd ignore either sign.

So in the end, the only thing a 30.06 sign does is keep law abiding citizens from carrying.

I would make a distinction between private property on to which the public has a reasonable expectation of an open invitation, by its purpose (bar, restaurant, store) vs private property on to which the public has no reasonable expectation of an open invitation (house, private club, etc.). IANAL, of course.

I would disallow a weapons prohibition for the first, but allow such prohibition on the second, with posting. But I've never been elected, so it's just my opinion.