TexasCHLforum.com

nitrogen wrote:The city of dallas owns the building, so the 30.06 posting is invalid.

I just double checked with the central apprasal district.

Code: Select all

   

#	Property Address	       City	        Owner Name / Business Name	Total Value	Type
1 	1717 N HARWOOD ST 	DALLAS 	DALLAS CITY OF 	               $1,324,600 	COMMERCIAL

I keep wondering if we should launch a campaign to get signs in situations like this taken down.

Tahoe132 wrote:Anyways, when I returned to the building, I went through another entrance which did not have the 30.06 sign posted. So is this legal to carry inside??

The way I understand it, just going through a different entrance does not put you in the clear. Imagine the following courtroom scenario:

Prosecutor: Were you aware at the time that the building was 30.06 posted?
Defendant: The back door wasn't posted.
Prosecutor: That wasn't the question. Did you or did you not see the posting on the front door?

Now, answer "No" to this question, and you've just committed perjury. Answer "Yes" and you've just incriminated yourself. Because although the law says that a building does have to post 30.06 signs in a conspicuous manner, I do not believe it explicitly states that all entrances must be marked. All that matters in your case is whether or not you received "notice."

BTW, I'm not trying to sound like a jerk or anything, just making the point that the law is pretty strict about this. Also, IANAL.