Sorry, but a lot of factors contribute to stock prices. Not really a valid argument.tommyg wrote:StarBuck is a public trade company all we have to do is to watch
the stock prices for StarBuck. If the stock price is going up we are winning
going down the anti crowd is winning. Stay the same no affect
Search found 6 matches
Return to “Starbucks on 2/14/12”
- Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:51 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks on 2/14/12
- Replies: 176
- Views: 26872
Re: Starbucks on 2/14/12
- Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:40 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks on 2/14/12
- Replies: 176
- Views: 26872
Re: Starbucks on 2/14/12
I dont think so.tommyg wrote: The boycott is more serious than most realize
They went full court press on Feb 14 to "boycott", and it flopped MISERABLY.
Starbucks has been shown gun owners support financially those that are willing to let us be.
We should all be grateful the majority of our opponents are poor, dirty hippies.
Much like Rush's advertisers who pulled out of his show, then wanted back....I think we showed decisively that starbucks current policy is spot on.
They're not going to cave to a vocal minority who has had zero effect on their sales.
- Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:53 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks on 2/14/12
- Replies: 176
- Views: 26872
Re: Starbucks on 2/14/12
Aw shucks.
Thanks for the kind words, Erik. I was happy to do it...and its the least I could do for someone on the front lines away from their loved one. Thank you for your service, and come home safe.
As to my actual visit to starbucks, it was pretty quiet. Being Killeen, I wasn't surprised to see no slightly smelly, vagrant looking anti gun protestors. I did see at least one guy in the store who fit the "profile" to be doing the same thing I was (older gentleman wearing a big vest). Other than looking like an idiot to the person working (apparently I don't know how to order coffee right...guess its because I'm not big on drinking the stuff) there was no drama involved.
Thanks for the kind words, Erik. I was happy to do it...and its the least I could do for someone on the front lines away from their loved one. Thank you for your service, and come home safe.
As to my actual visit to starbucks, it was pretty quiet. Being Killeen, I wasn't surprised to see no slightly smelly, vagrant looking anti gun protestors. I did see at least one guy in the store who fit the "profile" to be doing the same thing I was (older gentleman wearing a big vest). Other than looking like an idiot to the person working (apparently I don't know how to order coffee right...guess its because I'm not big on drinking the stuff) there was no drama involved.
- Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:54 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks on 2/14/12
- Replies: 176
- Views: 26872
Re: Starbucks on 2/14/12
Erik, PM sent.
- Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:26 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks on 2/14/12
- Replies: 176
- Views: 26872
Re: Starbucks on 2/14/12
Much like the made up facts they use in their anti gun arguments...their membership numbers are figments of their deranged imagination.
- Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:18 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks on 2/14/12
- Replies: 176
- Views: 26872
Re: Starbucks on 2/14/12
I doubt they will ever sell more booze than coffee.snatchel wrote:I support them in their effort to respect our 2nd Amendment rights... but their choice to serve alcohol too worries me. If they do start serving locally, I wonder if next we see some blue 51% signs.. and eventuallly red 51% signs?