I had exactly the same thought as you. One 30.06 sign for CHL's and one 30.07 for Open carry.RPB wrote:My opinion on how it "should have been done"
Really, there should be added to the Penal Code Section 30.07 for open carry
1) Then a business wanting to ban "concealed" (but allow open) will still post a 30.06 sign (Seriously, some "anti's want to know by armbands or whatever method, who is armed)
2) A business which allows concealed but prohibits open will post a 30.07 sign but no 30.06 sign
3) Any business wanting to prohibit both concealed and open needs to post 4 signs (2 English and 2 Spanish) for 30.06 and 30.07 about 3 feet by 4 feet tall each
I think that would be ideal; any business with 4 huge signs obviously wants to lose well over 500,000 customers PLUS their families business from their potential customer base.
But, that would have been more work than just using a word processor to search the codes for the word "Concealed" and strike it out everywhere..... However, sometimes it's worth putting forth a bit more effort when drafting legal documents and such ...Just my pinion ...
Search found 1 match
Return to “HB 2756 Open Carry bill reported favorably”
- Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:37 am
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 2756 Open Carry bill reported favorably
- Replies: 317
- Views: 122989