TexasCHLforum.com

MeMelYup wrote:

JJVP wrote:

Jaguar wrote:

Piney wrote:/soapbox
Once these businesses realize a 30.06 signage policy is an advertisement for robberies, perhaps these types of instances will stop. Having the ability to remove the perps' ability to continue, if you get my drift..., is part of the answer. /off

To be fair, the sign probably did not apply to these robbers, I would be surprised to learn any of them had a CHL.

You see, that's the problem with the 30.06 signs. They need to modify it.

“Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (concealed handgun law), or any other person or felon not licenced to carry a handgun or rifle may not enter this property with a concealed or unconcealed handgun or rifle"

See, that solves the problem.

I strongly disagree, with that wording 1sign will encompass all. As a CHL'r I definitely don't want that.

jimlongley wrote:

JJVP wrote:

Jaguar wrote:

Piney wrote:/soapbox
Once these businesses realize a 30.06 signage policy is an advertisement for robberies, perhaps these types of instances will stop. Having the ability to remove the perps' ability to continue, if you get my drift..., is part of the answer. /off

To be fair, the sign probably did not apply to these robbers, I would be surprised to learn any of them had a CHL.

You see, that's the problem with the 30.06 signs. They need to modify it.

“Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (concealed handgun law), or any other person or felon not licenced to carry a handgun or rifle may not enter this property with a concealed or unconcealed handgun or rifle"

See, that solves the problem.

Yeah, then it wouldn't be compliant with the language required and everyone could carry.

jimlongley wrote:

JJVP wrote:

Jaguar wrote:

Piney wrote:/soapbox
Once these businesses realize a 30.06 signage policy is an advertisement for robberies, perhaps these types of instances will stop. Having the ability to remove the perps' ability to continue, if you get my drift..., is part of the answer. /off

To be fair, the sign probably did not apply to these robbers, I would be surprised to learn any of them had a CHL.

You see, that's the problem with the 30.06 signs. They need to modify it.

“Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (concealed handgun law), or any other person or felon not licenced to carry a handgun or rifle may not enter this property with a concealed or unconcealed handgun or rifle"

See, that solves the problem.

Yeah, then it wouldn't be compliant with the language required and everyone could carry.

Jaguar wrote:

Piney wrote:/soapbox
Once these businesses realize a 30.06 signage policy is an advertisement for robberies, perhaps these types of instances will stop. Having the ability to remove the perps' ability to continue, if you get my drift..., is part of the answer. /off

To be fair, the sign probably did not apply to these robbers, I would be surprised to learn any of them had a CHL.