TexasCHLforum.com

Jasonw560 wrote:Campus Safety Act?

Takes the idea of the students carrying away, and puts emphasis on the campus safer for individuals.

Or the CHL Extension Act?

That's more to the point of what we want, but don't know if it's innocuous enough. Perhaps just the "License Extension Act". That could be any license.

terryg wrote:

C-dub wrote:

lkd wrote:Sadly, I think the only thing that will turn the tide is an on-campus event similar to Luby's.

I my meanest, most grouchy, hateful days, I still wouldn't wish that experience on anybody.

Unfortunately, we already have. Columbine and Virginia Tech. The anti's still think the police can protect everyone. IMHO, this all goes back to the unwillingness to accept personal responsibility for anything. The hardcore liberal believes he can do no wrong and that someone else, be it society or parents or whoever, is always to blame. Someone made them bad. They didn't make that decision on their own. Someone pushed them by not giving them a choice, chance, or whatever.

Exactly right. They also beleive that more guns always always escalates a situation. Only testimony like that of Amanda Collins, where the CHL law clearly could have made a difference, can possibly have any sway. And even in that situation, the liberal academic elite is likely to claim that if she would have had her gun, the rapist would probably have killed her rather than her defending herself from him.

Hoi Polloi wrote:The thought just occured to me that there are a whole lot of NRA members who must have been apathetic to the cause for the congressmen to hear so little from them. Reaching that group and mobilizing them would not be a primary need, but I think it would play an important support role.

Likewise, I think we need to get more young adult women to a range.