Search found 2 matches

by surprise_i'm_armed
Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:57 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Who decided a 1911 is a "fighting pistol"?Other guns aren't.
Replies: 21
Views: 2219

Re: Who decided a 1911 is a "fighting pistol"?Other guns are

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2011 ... le-pistol/

The above link has a short update on the M45 Close Quarters Battle Pistol (date unknown).

Reading the comments is interesting, especially the tan block from a health care worker in Galveston/Houston
who complains about the lowlifes who come in with two 9MM holes in the chest, but they're about ready to get
up and run away. That's why he is a .45 guy now. :-)

SIA
by surprise_i'm_armed
Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:51 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Who decided a 1911 is a "fighting pistol"?Other guns aren't.
Replies: 21
Views: 2219

Who decided a 1911 is a "fighting pistol"?Other guns aren't.

All right, here's something that I have been wondering.

I can't provide a link to any specific article or website, but over time I have seen the 1911 described
as a "fighting pistol".

Well, all guns that shoot bullets could be useful in a gunfight, so who/what criteria has defined the 1911 as
a "fighting pistol"?

If you had some other pistol in 9MM, .40, or .45 (but not a 1911 style), wouldn't you be able to fight with
that just as well?

Is the "fighting pistol" description simply a nod to the fact that many US military personnel used this gun
in combat?

Is it the 1911's single action?

Or has the term "fighting pistol" simply been adopted by the 1911 fanboys to make their gun better than
a 9MM Taurus?

TIA / SIA

Return to “Who decided a 1911 is a "fighting pistol"?Other guns aren't.”