I am a business owner, and have been for 27 years. No one sent me any kind of information to alert me that there was such a sign as a "30.06" that would effectively give notice to legal CHL's that their concealed handguns weren't welcome in my place of business. I have several other friends and acquaintances that also own businesses of various types, and not one of them knows the difference between a "gun-busters" sign and a 30.06. Since they never actually "see" a handgun in their place of business, they are oblivious to the CHLs that come and go on a daily basis. Once a few "Bareque" guns start showing up, and a few of their customers get that "not so fresh feeling", they WILL find out about proper signage that will no doubt include prohibiting concealed as well as open carry. THAT will limit my currently wonderful freedom to carry. No doubt about it. The only "remedy" would be to completely trample private (business owner's) property rights.... but we've beat this one to death, and it seems no one has changed their minds.
surv
Search found 2 matches
Return to “OK passes open carry & TSRA planning for Texas '11 session”
- Sun May 09, 2010 10:25 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: OK passes open carry & TSRA planning for Texas '11 session
- Replies: 127
- Views: 22468
- Sun May 09, 2010 9:18 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: OK passes open carry & TSRA planning for Texas '11 session
- Replies: 127
- Views: 22468
Re: OK passes open carry & TSRA planning for Texas '11 sessi
hhhmmmm.... are Six Flags and Government meetings "off limits" due to statute or due to 30.06 postings?
One of us needs to brush up on our knowledge of the Texas CHL laws in order to be more persuasive in our arguments.....maybe it's me
surv
eta: nope..it's not me.....I just checked, and the little item "i" is still in the code
One of us needs to brush up on our knowledge of the Texas CHL laws in order to be more persuasive in our arguments.....maybe it's me
surv
eta: nope..it's not me.....I just checked, and the little item "i" is still in the code