Someone openly selling cocaine in a bar is not a good analogy. First of all, most bars are small enough you can see/hear most everything that goes on from the bar. The Saxet gun show took up a space the size of a half a Sam's Club warehouse. Even if it WAS the promoter's responsibility, which it is not, how is he supposed to police this? Isn't it the police department's job to police illegal activity?30-30 wrote:As I said, I do NOT agree with the tactics used here to force this upon the gun show owner. I am very much for private sales, and despise the ATF.
As for the Saxet show, it was quite obvious what was going on there. As far as Saxet not being responsible for the conduct of others in there, would you say the same thing if they were openly selling cocaine from the tables every show? You really think a bar owner that allowed folks to sell/use drugs openly in his bar would stay out of trouble by saying "hey, I just let them in here and sell them booze!"
Also, it's a stretch to say illegal gun sales went on "openly" at Saxet show. I attended nearly every Saxet show last year and I didn't see any of this. Sure some of the non-FFL "collectors" tout "no paperwork" because, let's face it, it is a selling point, and not necessarily for illegal sales. Some law-abiding folks are just more fearful of the gubment or believe background checks and paperwork infringe on their 2A RKBA. I never once heard a seller saying "no paperwork" in Spanish to Hispanic customers, but then I don't speak Spanish so how would I know?
As 06nop said, Austin is a "sanctuary city" and APD does not arrest illegals or even ask them for ID. There is a "Mexican flea market" right next door to the gun show. If APD doesn't ask for ID and let's illegals roam free, why are they harassing private gun sellers for not checking ID?
But the bigger point in all this is that it is NOT the gun show promoter's job to enforce Federal gun laws. If the promoter knew of illegal sales and didn't report them or looked the other way or actively encouraged them, then he would already be under arrest.
The appearance of crime, or even crime itself, is NOT a good enough reason to infringe the rights of every law-abiding participant. Lots of people use handguns to commit crime. Having a handgun on your person gives many people the appearance you intend to commit a crime. Therefore all handguns should be banned, right? How is your logic here any different?30-30 wrote:but there was a bunch of shady dealing (or the appearance thereof) that was simply begging for trouble. Personally, if I were running the show myself, I'd only allow FFLs to have tables to sell guns (none needed for the junk/beef jerky vendors of course) simply from the fact that there are folks that seem to always be "looking to sell a few guns from their collections" every show, which leads to the ATF poking around more to bust them for operating as a dealer without a license (I don't know about now, but back in the day they just gave you an ultimatum to get an FFL, or they'd make your life miserable). Note that this wouldn't stop folks walking around and selling/buying to each other, it would just cut down on the shadier folks at the shows.
And why do non-FFL collectors seem so "shady" to you? Are they any more shady than someone who sells 3 or 4 guns here on TexasCHLForum.com or on TexasGunTrader.com ? Guns are a very personal product to purchase. A gun owner needs to be completely comfortable and confident in the gun(s) he/she owns, especially if used for self defense, hunting, or any other activity other than general plinking. But, unlike cars, you can't really test drive a gun. Sure, you can rent a gun at the range and then buy a similar model. But you can't test drive the actual gun you're going to purchase (unless you're purchasing a used gun FTF and seller agrees to it). So, many people buy a lot of guns before they find the gun(s) they like best and are most comfortable and confident to own/use. What are we supposed to do with all the guns we ended up not liking? Turn them in to Dallas PD or LAPD for food stamps or teddy bears?
By forcing all sellers to use an FFL middleman, APD/ATF not only are forcing all transactions to be recorded but they're also hindering free commerce by forcing law-abiding citizens to use a middleman to complete a transaction, thus ensuring the middleman gets his cut of the deal, and ensuring that no individual seller will be able to venture far from the pricing set by the FFLs. Best analogy I've heard relating to this is how would you like it if the government forced you to use a real estate agent to sell your home? I'm a Realtor and even I would be against that; and most FFLs are against an end to private party sales.